Independent GTM Due Diligence

Don't invest on hope.
Get the evidence first.

Operator-led GTM diligence for PE, VC, and M&A buyers. We stress-test the revenue story and deliver an IC-ready verdict.

Response within 4 business hours · Expedited timelines for active deals
PE Firms VC Investors M&A Acquirers Founders Raising
Why GTM DD Now

The math on GTM execution risk has changed.

Holds are longer. Fundraising windows are stretched. Add-ons dominate the deal flow. The margin for GTM execution error has narrowed.

6.7yrs
Hold Period
Average PE holding period in 2024 — well above the long-term average of 5.7 years.
McKinsey Global Private Markets Report, 2025
74%
Add-On Deals
Of US PE buyouts in 2024 were add-ons — consolidation and operational synergies dominate.
PitchBook · Cherry Bekaert, 2024
16.2mo
To Close a Fund
Median time to close a buyout fund in 2024, up from 11 months in 2022.
PitchBook, 2024
$1.3T
Dry Powder
Held by buyout firms — 24% aging four years or more.
Bain & Company, Global PE Report 2025

The squeeze is real. Stress-testing the revenue story before commitment is no longer optional. It's the cheapest way to price the GTM risk.

Who This Is For

Different seat. Same blind spot.

Buy-Side · Investors

Validate the growth thesis before you commit capital

Independent assessment of revenue quality, pipeline integrity, and GTM scalability. Findings ranked by deal impact, priced for your IC.

Buy-Side · M&A

Know what you're acquiring before you sign

GTM diligence scoped to your acquisition thesis. Customer concentration, retention risk, team dependency, market defensibility.

Sell-Side · Founders

Pressure-test your GTM before investors do

Same methodology investors use to evaluate your deal, run before the process starts. Find the gaps. Fix them. Enter DD with confidence, not surprises.

Portfolio · Value Creation

Turn DD findings into growth

Embed a fractional GTM leader to fix what the DD uncovered and scale your portfolio companies hands-on. Learn more →

The Blind Spot

The numbers get audited. The code gets reviewed. The growth engine gets a slide deck.

Revenue looks strong on the P&L

But 40% sits in one account, NRR is declining, and the pipeline relies on a handful of key relationships, not a repeatable process.

The growth plan sounds plausible

But CAC has doubled in 18 months, sales cycle is lengthening, and the ICP shifted without anyone noticing.

The product-market fit looks proven

But the ICP that drove initial traction isn't the one in the growth plan. The buyer profile shifted, the competitive landscape changed, and the pricing that worked at $1M ARR breaks at $5M.

Our Methodology

The Revenue Integrity Score

Composite scoring model · 6 GTM dimensions · Calibrated by deal impact

Six dimensions that go deeper than the data room. Each scored, risk-rated, and mapped to deal impact so your IC can price the risk, not guess it.

Six dimensions assessed

Revenue Quality

Concentration, cohort retention, contract durability, expansion vs. new logo mix, and revenue predictability under stress scenarios.

Pipeline Integrity

Stage progression accuracy, coverage ratios, velocity trends, conversion by segment. Is the pipeline built to sustain growth or built to close a round?

Unit Economics

CAC payback, fully-loaded LTV, blended vs. segment-level margins, and trajectory under the deal model's growth assumptions.

Retention & Expansion

Gross and net retention by cohort, churn drivers, expansion triggers, and the gap between reported NRR and economic NRR.

GTM Team & Process

Quota attainment distribution, ramp times, key-person dependency, process maturity, and ability to scale without the founders selling.

Market & Defensibility

Competitive positioning durability, ICP clarity, pricing power signals, and whether growth requires category expansion or market share capture.

Tech Verticals

The sectors we operate in.

Digital Assets & DeFi

Fintech & RegTech

B2B SaaS

Cleantech

Biotech & HealthTech

B2C SaaS & Consumer

Patterns We See

Six failure patterns that destroy value across portfolios.

These are not edge cases. They are systematic patterns we surface again and again across SaaS, fintech, DeFi, and B2B tech deals. Knowing where to look is half the work.

Pattern 01

Founder-led to codified sales transition

  • Founder relationships can't be replicated by hired sales
  • Value prop lives in the founder's head, not in playbooks
  • Deal qualification relies on intuition, not criteria
  • New hire ramp time stretches indefinitely
Pattern 02

Pipeline staged to close a round, not sustain growth

  • Coverage looks healthy, conversion math doesn't
  • Stage progression inflated to hit board metrics
  • Velocity drops sharply once segmented by ICP
  • Coverage ratio meaningfully below requirement at this stage
Pattern 03

Unit economics that fall apart fully-loaded

  • LTV:CAC reported without fully-loaded acquisition costs
  • CAC payback longer than reported once you include CS
  • Gross margin erodes from implementation and support
  • Headline NRR masks segments that destroy value
Pattern 04

ICP drift mid-scale

  • The ICP that drove $1M ARR isn't the one in the plan
  • Buyer profile shifted, sales messaging didn't follow
  • Pricing structure breaks above a contract size threshold
  • Competitive positioning frozen vs. evolving market
Pattern 05

Retention numbers masking net losses

  • NRR positive only because of upsell from a few accounts
  • Cohort retention reveals a pattern the headline hides
  • Churn drivers structural, not addressable by CS effort
  • Gap between reported NRR and economic NRR is non-trivial
Pattern 06

Quota attainment concentration

  • A small minority of reps carrying the majority of the number
  • Compensation rewards activity over outcomes
  • Hiring plan unrealistic relative to talent market
  • Sales leadership experience insufficient for planned scale
Our Founder

Built it. Funded it. Scaled it. Now I assess it.

GTM Due Diligence founder

12 years operating at the intersection of tech, finance, and regulation across 9 countries. I've raised capital, evaluated deals as an investor, architected GTM strategies, and scaled revenue from early-stage startups to scale-ups across digital assets, fintech, and B2B SaaS. I know which questions matter most and where the real risks and opportunities live.

Connect on LinkedIn
Speed Meets Judgment

AI surfaces the signals.
We add judgment and experience.

GTM Roast · AI + Human Review
Score 6 dimensions in 72 hours
Surface the top GTM risks fast
Know if a deal is worth going deeper
Premium Assessment · Operator-Led
Management interviews reveal what data can't
IC-ready report with deal impact mapping
Live debrief and scenario walk-throughs
What You'll Get

Clear overview of the deal verdict.

Three views from a real assessment. Names redacted. The signal is what your IC sees on day one.

Findings

What we found.

  • Revenue concentration

    Top customer = 38% of ARR. Renewal in Q3.

  • Pipeline coverage

    2.1x on plan vs. 3.5x required at this stage.

  • Founder-led closes

    71% of FY deals touched by CEO directly.

Excerpt · Executive Risk Memo
Live Score

Revenue Integrity Score.

62 / 100
Caution · Below threshold
12-month composite trend
Pipeline coverage
2.1x
Net Revenue Retention
94%
Dimension Drilldown

Where the risk sits.

  • Revenue Quality 64
  • Pipeline Integrity 52
  • Unit Economics 71
  • Retention & Expansion 58
  • GTM Team & Process 34
  • Market & Defensibility 69
Flag Founder dependency — deal impact: pricing
What You Get

IC-ready deliverables.

Revenue Integrity Scorecard

Composite score + dimension-level ratings with risk flags ranked by deal impact.

Executive Risk Memo

2-page IC summary. Findings, deal implications, and risk-adjusted considerations.

Deep-Dive Report

Full analysis across all six dimensions. Data-backed, interview-driven, evidence-supported.

Live Debrief

Presentation to your deal team or board. Findings, Q&A, scenario walk-throughs.

Pricing

Two ways to stress-test the GTM.

From a quick roast to a full 360. Transparent pricing, no surprise scoping calls.

GTM Roast
Launch pilot — 20 spots at $590
$590 $990
$590. One deal. One verdict.
  • Spot the GTM strengths and red flags fast
  • The 3 GTM risks worth investigating further
  • Actionable recommendations, not just a diagnosis
  • One-page summary to guide your next move
Run the GTM Roast →
Start the Conversation

Have a deal to stress-test?

Tell us about the deal — sector, stage, GTM concerns, timeline. Response within 4 business hours. Confidential by default.

Common Questions

Frequently asked.

The Roast is your filter. AI-powered, human-reviewed, delivered in days. It tells you if a deal's GTM is worth going deeper on. The Premium is your verdict. Operator-led, interview-driven, IC-ready. It tells you whether to do the deal and at what price.

Advisory firms charge $150K+ and assign junior analysts who run frameworks. We go deeper into what actually drives revenue: pipeline quality, sales process maturity, customer concentration, founder dependency. Operator experience from both sides of the deal table. Sharper signal, faster delivery, a fraction of the cost.

AI is compressing sales cycles and making entire GTM motions obsolete overnight. A revenue engine that worked 18 months ago may already be breaking. GTM DD reveals whether growth is built on durable mechanics or on assumptions the market has already moved past.

Series A through growth-stage VC, M&A, and PE deals. Earlier-stage deals focus on founder dependency and pipeline repeatability. Later-stage deals stress-test unit economics, retention, and whether the GTM scales without the founders selling.

Yes. We run the same assessment investors would, before the process starts. You find the gaps, fix them, and enter DD with confidence instead of surprises. Better to discover a problem yourself than have an investor find it for you.

Yes. Hidden customer concentration, inflated pipeline, retention numbers masking net losses, a GTM motion that collapses without the founder. We don't kill deals. We make sure you price the risk before you commit the capital.

Don't invest on hope. Get the evidence first.

Tell us about the deal. We'll tell you what a scoped assessment looks like and whether it's worth your time.

Response within 4 business hours · Expedited timelines for active deals